Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.


The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Welcome to This is a work in progress version of a new site on federal data resources.

Open Data Engagement Guidance

On any given month, there are multiple events listed on in which federal agencies engage with the public, the private sector, non-profits, academia and others on open data issues. From the numerous open data events held by federal agencies in the last several years, there are a number of lessons learned and best practices in engaging with the public on open data and holding events.

Articulate the purpose of the event

Agencies that have held open data events have found that emphasizing the purpose of the event is critical to success. It can be essential in gaining agency leadership support and approvals for the public engagement or event. For example, the annual USDA Open Data Summer Camp, aimed at high school students, is designed to increase awareness and understanding of the Department of Agriculture’s mission and activities. As members of America’s agricultural community age, it is important for USDA to connect with young people and inform them of agriculture’s role in the economy and American culture. USDA hopes this awareness will spur young people’s interest in agriculture as they reach higher education and the workforce. Other purposes of public participation in open data include:

  • Expanding public awareness of agency mission or project
  • Recruitment strategy for agency hiring

Agencies have also followed the practice of making sure that the purpose of the event is at the top of agendas and other written materials, stating the purpose verbally at the beginning of an event, having it visible on a screen during an event, and mentioning it throughout the planning process for open data events, including in internal meetings.

Confirm capability to hold events

The initial steps in planning an open data event generally pertain to determining the agency’s ability to hold the event. Factors to determine include: Location - whether agency facilities for the type and size of event are available or another location is required. Partners - whether the event needs to be co-sponsored with an outside organization for funding or other reasons, and what each partner may contribute to the event in terms of funding, donations in kind, staffing, etc. Leadership support - gaining agency leadership support for the event, and having the support of senior agency officials who can be the “champions” for the event.

  • Getting leadership support may sometimes require presentation to multiple internal audiences to get approvals.
  • One method that can help gain leadership approval is if the advocacy for the event is from not just agency staff, but other partners such as industry or non-government organizations that support open data.
  • It is also important to keep the leadership informed throughout the development of the event, with regular updates on new commitments from participants for the event. Legal authorities - legal questions that can arise that require working with agency general counsel’s offices include:

  • Legal authorities to hold the event or partner with outside organizations
  • What agencies can and cannot do in interaction with industry participants
  • Drafting necessary agreements such as Memoranda of Understanding with non-government co-sponsors
  • Procurement issues in obtaining services such as outside space, event planners, audio/visual support, etc. Logistics issues - events in federal spaces raise issues such as:

  • Security/clearance for non-federal attendees
  • Rules regarding providing food or drinks at the event
  • Web page for the event

Identify specific and measurable goals

Agencies benefit from setting measurable goals for the public engagement or event. They contribute to the quality of the activity and can help in making comparisons to previous events.

Examples of quantitative goals include:

  • Number of participants
  • Diversity of participants (by role, agency, sector)
  • Number of challenges identified
  • Number of solutions developed Insight from goals include:
  • Year over year growth in participants for annual events
  • Number of solutions that received funding, created economic impact

In some cases, it can be difficult to create quantitative goals from an open data event. If measurable, quantitative goals are not possible, event organizers should at least define tangible next steps from an event. They can include commitments to launch a pilot project or create a public-private partnership to do additional work on the subject matter of the open data event.

Align goals with agency mission

Aligning the goals for the open data event with the agency mission is an important factor in success, particularly with gaining agency leadership support for a public engagement or open data event. Examples of goals include:

  • Contribution to an agency’s IT modernization
  • Improve efficiency in data sharing with the public, other agencies
  • Use of open data event to further a core mission of an agency, such as transportation safety or supporting education

Document roles and responsibilities for those involved in the initiative

Agencies that have held events have found it a best practice to clearly document roles and responsibilities for those working on planning the event, especially for events that involve working with outside organizations as co-sponsors. Some agencies have used a detailed “tick tock” document with daily action items that show what each individual team member must complete.

Hold regular check-ins with those involved in the implementation

Planning of most open data events begins with ad hoc meetings at the early stages, then monthly, weekly, or other intervals with increasing frequency as the date of the event nears. A best practice is to make sure that for each task or line of effort such as press, logistics, IT, etc., that there is a primary contact and also a backup for each line of effort.

Use multiple outlets to reach participants such as website, social media

Many agencies have found it useful to develop a core set of materials for an event and then share with all the partners, so that each partner can disseminate through its own channels such as email lists, websites, and social media accounts. Agencies have used a number of different methods to reach participants and publicize their open data events:

  • Website. Agencies have used their own and partner organization websites to promote the events in news and event sections.
  • Social Media. Agencies have used their own and partner organization social media accounts to promote events.
  • Interagency meetings. Agencies have used interagency meetings, such as the open data working group meeting, to promote events, as well as interagency listservs and the page.

Agencies have found it to be a best practice to make sure there is consistent design across print and digital materials promoting the events. Agencies have also tried to be as inclusive as possible in the language for the event, to make sure that ideas are welcome not just from technologists, but from other types of participants, whether they work on the relevant policies or are from the communities affected by the subject matter of the event.

Agencies and other organizations that have held open data events have dedicated resources to make sure to monitor support email addresses and social media accounts to respond to participant questions and requests. Typically, event organizers have created a central email address for questions/requests for assistance, and assigned a team of people with access to the email.

Motivate people to participate and address the interests of potential participants

One way that agencies have used to ensure that the event meets the interest of participants is to get the participants to choose agenda topics. In some cases agencies have crowdsourced ideas for specific challenges to take on during the event. Where possible, open data event organizers have conducted brief surveys or interviews of potential participants to make sure that planning for the event stays focused on participant interests.

Assess data collected after the event to determine whether the initiative met its goals

Agencies have collected data about the open data events to determine whether the event met the agency goals. Most often, agencies have conducted surveys of the participants to assess their satisfaction with the event. In instances where agencies partnered with outside organizations, agencies found it useful to have the partner take responsibility for surveying participants. Agencies have also examined media and social media coverage of the event and reported the results to agency leadership. Another best practice learned from those who have held multiple events is to do the feedback collection at the event itself, in person, on a physical card, with a few minutes set aside in the schedule for providing feedback, as it results in a much higher response rate than an online survey following the event.

A best practice is to create a spreadsheet after the event, that shows the geographic region, industry sector of participants, the number of media mentions, social media analytics, number of online participants, and number of blog posts beyond those that were planned or requested by the event organizers.

Analyze the feedback from partners and participants and report publicly on achievements and lessons learned

Agencies generally analyze the success of the event and the feedback they received from participants to record lessons learned. When possible, agencies create a final report of the event that can be shared publicly. In some cases, having a non-government partner taking the lead for publication of achievements and lessons learned has made it easier to quickly publish a report. Most agencies conduct internal post-event sessions to get perspective from those who organized the event to find what was successful and what could be changed in subsequent events and prepare internal documentation. In many cases agencies have worked on blog posts for publication on agency websites and partner websites to report on the achievements of the event, as well as disseminating links for additional information.

Acknowledge and reward efforts achievements of partners and participants

The recognition of the achievements of participants is an important step at the conclusion of an event. For example, the annual USDA Open Data Summer Camp has a graduation ceremony for the student participants. The students get to present their projects and what they have learned about USDA open data to the audience. Graduates have had the opportunity to present in other settings as well, such as the interagency Open Data working group.

Seek ways to maintain communication with members of the community

Maintaining communication with the community that is created from an open data event has been among the most challenging aspects of agency public engagement in open data. In most cases, the communication post event is concentrated in the blog posts, media coverage, and social media activity immediately following the event. The events that have been most successful in continuing communication with the community result in some type of clearly identified post event activity, such as a new website focused on the open data issue that was the topic of the event. A dedicated website for sharing new content or communication within the community, however, can succeed only with dedicated resources for maintaining the website and taking responsibility for keeping it current and maintaining the level of community communication. In other cases, identifying a tangible goal at the beginning of the open data event such as a subsequent pilot project or other next steps with commitments from participants to contribute on a specific effort after the open data event can ensure that the interaction from the open data event continues.